Should Leaders Show Vulnerability?

Friends,

Tomorrow, Jennifer and I officially release A Governor’s Story: The Fight for Jobs and America’s Economic Future.  It took us about 18 months to write, and it’s about 300 pages long, so, (how) can I distill a decent Reading for Leading message?  (Warning: I run a paragraph longer than usual, but beg you to reach the end and hit the “comment” button.)  The book focuses on the massive change in our economy brought on by the one-two punch of global trade and phenomenal technological breakthroughs that have KO’ed thousands of American workers in manufacturing and many other fields as well.  We have outlined what we believe are new and important ways that America can adjust to meet its challenges.  But RFL has never been about political economy and won’t be today.  Instead: a thought on modern, human leadership.

It’s a mixed bag.  Jennifer didn’t want to write puffery – a leader-knows-it-all book.  It wouldn’t have been credible.  She presided over the government while the Michigan economy was going through its worst period since the Great Depression. I encouraged, at times cajoled her/us to tell the inner story.  That wasn’t easy.

Like many great (extrovert) leaders, she’s an “outer story” person. Unlike “it’s all about me – me,” she’s all about others – like the 2700 workers in Greenville, whose jobs were moved to Mexico overnight. But in the book, Jennifer gives a peek into her own heavy-lifting.  As governor, she’d periodically startle me out of sleep, as she exhaled like a weight-lifter emitting bursts of air through pursed lips.  I imagined that in her dreams she was straining to pull 10 million people up the hill that stood before Michigan. I came to see that she was also pulling the weight of her own battered identity.  Just as factory workers were accustomed to fairly ready access to good paying work, Jennifer had been accustomed to outworking everyone and securing awesome results. This time, the results that mattered just didn’t come.

The book begs the question I ask of you: Should a leader tell?  Tell that he’s not sure.  Tell that she’s struggling, too. Tell people that (although she has a plan) she’s no more got a magic wand in her hand than the dumped workers at Electrolux had one in theirs? On the big scale such self-disclosure exposes a leader to accusations of weakness, if not to scorn. FDR, one of our heroes, remains an idol, in part because he never let the public see his crutches, and told us “there’s nothing to fear…”  Jennifer led with that type of insistent confidence; it was not feigned but real.

Yet, as Kouzes & Posner write, “leaders go first,” by which they mean that leaders show vulnerability, admit ignorance, and invite others to tell the truth, and lead themselves.  I know on the personal scale of leadership we want bosses, priests, managers, etc., who are adults and who relate to us as adults, not like old-fashioned parents who pretend that they know all and only do good.

When we let – or even seek – paternalistic leaders to tell us “everything’s gonna be fine,” and “I’ve got it all under control,” we create absurd expectations that are sure to lead to further disappointment (or, it seems, rage these days) and in turn, ironically, heighten our mistrust of leaders. What do you think? How real do you let yourself be?  How do you walk the line – offering important assurance and confidence and direction – yet inviting participation and candor? Jennifer and I have shared a story of leadership.  I hope this week’s comments will be the richest ever as you share your own stories of how you

Lead with your best self,

Dan

 

 

  • Maintaining a sense of optimism in positive and negative times is a topic recently covered in annarbor.com ‘s article regarding the current governor’s use of positive rhetoric in good times and bad.

    http://www.annarbor.com/business-review/what-rick-snyders-college-research-project-says-about-the-governor-today/

    Is there a point at which the “Pollyanna hypothesis” becomes harmful, in a similar way that stoic leadership where vulnerability is never demonstrated can be?

    Personally, I think maintaining a positive attitude in good times and bad can weaken the power that positivity can have. In the same way, I believe never showing vulnerability, when we all know it exists, does not demonstrate that the person is strong. Rather, it shows that the person is not able to toe the delicate line between strength and sensitivity.

  • Dan, great question. I believe leadership too often is about power and the illusion of that power’s Oz like mastery over all things affecting those in your charge. Whether you call in vulnerability or not, the truth is no one person in any organization has the ability to know all things or the capability to impact consequential change. To lead is to communicate. FDR lead by asking more of every citizen, soldier, govt employee, etc. Like many great leaders, he presented the problem, continuously communicated the need for all of us to take personal ownership and accountability in executing to the vision. Being a leader is about great communication and involving all those that touch the issue in developing and committing to a solution. If that means you have to admit you don’t have all the answers, so be it. Those who are committed won’t judge you as less, but will rally with you to inspire others to the change that is needed.

  • >